In law school, one of my first reading assignments in constitutional law was Federalist No. 10, in which James Madison tackled the problem of factions in a republic. [Among other things, Madison believed that a large republic was preferable to a small republic because that would increase the chances of electing competent representatives. To put it mildly, Americans are putting that belief to the test in 2016.]
But back to factions: Our society is full of them. We’re divided into factions based on race, religion, political party, views on hot-button issues of the day, nationality, ethnicity, or whether you should put salt on watermelon (no, you shouldn’t). You name it, and we can find a reason to divide over it. Or as Bob Wiley told Dr. Leo Marvin, “There are two types of people in this world: those who like Neil Diamond, and those who don’t. My ex-wife loves him.”
From what I can tell, a lot of factions arise from one group’s fear of those who are not like them – those who are “other”. The “others” then react negatively toward the first group, and things spiral from there. Fear is usually not a productive emotion, as any Jedi Master can tell you:
Fear is the path to the dark side. Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering.
– Yoda, The Phantom Menace
Factions go way, way back in history. In Old Testament times, the Jewish worldview was largely “Us against everyone else” because God chose the Jews to be his people – no one else followed God. Even after Jesus Christ’s arrival and the subsequent spread of Christianity, Paul had to deal with factions that immediately sprang up in some of the new churches he was ministering to.
Back to the present: After yet another round of violence over the past few weeks seemed to divide many of us into pro- and anti-police camps, the New York Times ran this fascinating story on something called “intergroup threat theory”:
When members of one social group feel it is under threat from another group, researchers say, this can heighten cognitive biases that distort how that group is perceived. That risks deepening social divisions and even, in extreme cases, escalating isolated episodes into conflict between groups.
So when we hear about something bad happening to someone in “our” group, and it was done by someone in an “other” group, our biases – our blind spots, our prejudices – kick into overdrive. As if we weren’t flawed enough already as humans, our identification with a group can throw us completely off-kilter when fear creeps into the picture. Other groups respond in kind (usually), and things just get worse from there.
But beware of the dark side. Anger, fear, aggression … the dark side of the Force are they. Easily they flow, quick to join you in a fight. If once you start down the dark path, forever it will dominate your destiny, consume you it will.
– Yoda, The Empire Strikes Back
How do we counter our instinct to embrace anger, fear, aggression? How do we avoid the dark side when there is so much darkness all around us?
This may come as a shock, but I don’t have much faith in our elected leaders to help us on this point (sorry, President Madison). As the Washington Post’s Michael Gerson pointed out in a column last week, Robert Kennedy is not walking through that door:
In fact, there are people on the left and right who benefit from encouraging just enough division, just enough fear, to motivate their supporters, without tipping them over into violence. They are playing with fire in a parched and withered land.
Our leaders play with fire, but unfortunately we’re the ones who get burned. It’s up to each of us to refuse to get sucked into the trap of viewing everything around us through a faction-based lens. We need to resist generalizations, knee-jerk reactions, and the “oh yeah?” responses. We need to remember that we’re Americans, “with a capital A” as John Winger said. David Brooks made the same point more eloquently in a column last week when he discussed other factions in our society, including the nationalists/particularists against the globalists/universalists. I found his concluding paragraphs very compelling:
The fact is that both mind-sets have their virtues. The particularists emphasize the intimate love and loyalty that is the stuff of real community. The universalists are moved by injustices anywhere, and morally repulsed by inaction and indifference in the face of that suffering.
The tragedy of this election is that America already solved this problem. Unlike France and China, we were founded as a universalist nation. You can be fiercely patriotic and relatively open because America was founded to take in people from around the globe and unite them around something new.
Unfortunately, the forces of multiculturalism destroyed that commitment to cultural union. That has led to Trump, who has upended universalistic American nationalism and replaced it with European blood and soil nationalism in a stars and stripes disguise.
The way out of this debate is not to go nationalist or globalist. It’s to return to American nationalism — espoused by people like Walt Whitman — which combines an inclusive definition of who is Our Own with a fervent commitment to assimilate and Take Care of them.
It’s up to us to do this. Jesus said, “But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you.” (Matthew 5:44) Pray for those who harm us and upset us. Pray for those we view as “other”. And yes, pray for our leaders to somehow help us through all of this.
———————
Postscript: This weekend, my wife and I took a drive through the central Virginia countryside, and I put on some music from my iPod. (Yes, I still have an iPod.) One of the songs was “We May Be The Ones” by Paul Westerberg. (Yes, I like Paul Westerberg. And the Replacements. So there.) The chorus goes, “We may well be the ones/to set this world on its ear/We may well be the ones/If nothing, why are we here?” Listening to that got me thinking – Jesus definitely set the world on its ear in his time here. Two thousand years later, if we love each other, and pray for each other, and pray to find ways to get past the factions that divide us, I think we could very well set the world on its ear one more time.