“Who do you play for?” That’s the question that U.S. ice hockey coach Herb Brooks barks at his players in the movie “Miracle”. He asks the question at a time when his players are too slow to put aside school and regional rivalries, and the tension is getting in the way of creating a true team.
Most of us don’t make our livelihood on sports teams, but for our day-to-day lives, we can ask the same question in other ways. Who do you trust? Who do you have faith in? Who do you believe? Who do you follow?
In the past few months, I really got sucked into the presidential election. I started believing that if my favorite candidate could somehow get into the White House, the world would be so much better. I would be so much happier. Fulfilled, even.
I was thinking about the election all the time. I kept kicking around ideas about how I could promote my candidate and put down the others, and after much delay, I finally wrote a 2,000-word screed with the intention of posting it on social media or emailing it to practically everyone in my address book.
A funny thing happened, though. By the time I finished writing, I was pretty happy with the final version … but I found myself looking at it and asking, “What’s the point?” It’s not that the election wasn’t important, but I realized that I was putting my faith in the wrong thing.
To answer Herb’s question: I “play” for Jesus. I’ve been forgetting that too much lately. I need to keep my focus on more eternal things while seeking God’s guidance for how I should deal with worldly things like politics.
After I finished my political ramblings, it felt like God tapped me on the shoulder and said, “There, do you feel better after getting that out? Now forget about it and come with me.” Not unlike a father soothing a child who just had a meltdown, I suppose. And a few days later, I came across this article that encourages silence instead of being a monologuer who “stands alone, barking lines to everyone”. Yes, I know a blog post is kind of a monologue, but I’m doing my best not to bark.
I still have my views on the election results, of course. But that’s not what’s important. The well-known words of Joshua 24:15 are appropriate here:
But if serving the Lord seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served beyond the Euphrates, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.
Not everyone chooses to serve God, but everyone serves something, whether it’s money, desire, politics, or any number of other earthly options. And those options provide the answer to Herb’s question. Do you play for money? Do you play for power? Do you play for the approval of others (a particularly seductive one in an age of “likes” and “followers”)? Do you play for pleasure, whether through food, drink, sex, or something else? As Thomas Aquinas wrote, “People in the world work in order to have crowns, but that crown is corruptible.”
In sports, political campaigns, and other things, we play for another purpose: to win. If we’re on the same team, we can quibble about how we’re going to win – who gets to play and how much, who gets the ball the most, what kind of plays to run, etc. – but everyone on the team has the same goal. The teams who can get past the arguing and find the overall approach that works the best are the ones who consistently win, who consistently fulfill their purpose.
With the U.S. presidential election results fresh in our minds, it’s a particularly good time to take stock of who we play for. We may have spent the past few months playing mostly for the Republicans, or the Democrats, or the Libertarians, or the Greens, or something else. But who are we going to play for now?
I’ve already made it clear that, as a Christian, I play for Jesus. But I want to make this particular blog post a little broader than that. Obviously, there are plenty of Americans who aren’t Christians – Jews, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, atheists, agnostics, those who call themselves Christian but aren’t, Pastafarians, etc. I want to speak to some of you right now (in addition to the Christians).
We need to play for the United States of America. This is a tall order given that our “team” just split the popular vote evenly between the two main presidential candidates, so half our team isn’t really on board with our soon-to-be leader. There is obviously a lot to quibble about.
But let’s think about the things we can agree on. I’ll start:
- We should help poor people in the United States and around the world.
- We should educate our children well.
- We should keep our residents and our country safe from harm.
- We should be nice, respectful, and considerate to each other.
- [Add your own here.]
I’m not trying to be a Pollyanna. I know that the problem with concepts as deceptively simple as the first three items on my list is that there are lots of different ways to accomplish those goals, and there is a lot of disagreement on the pros and cons of each way.
Unfortunately, when there is so much disagreement, our focus tends to shift from “Let’s accomplish this goal together” to “How can I get my idea to be the ‘winning’ idea? I want to win.” We see this all the time in our American political system, where our elected officials have their eye on getting re-elected more than they do in coming together to solve problems.
This article from last week takes a swing at addressing this problem. Instead of looking at politics as a war or a contest, can we look it as a garden? That is, a communal plot that all of us are responsible for maintaining and improving?
The author highlights immigration policy as a prime example. He worked for a Christian advocacy organization that put together some proposals for not only macro-level ideas but also for micro-level things like how we can improve the treatment of people who are in the process of being deported (e.g., something as simple as giving them back their smartphone with a fully charged battery instead of a drained one). So what happened in this quest to “find common ground in promoting human dignity and justice in the midst of deep political disagreement”?
We believed that these changes could be made if a few members of congress [sic] from each side of the aisle put pressure on the Justice Department to do so. These changes would not be ideologically motivated, politically controversial policy changes, but changes in processes that would make a significant positive difference in the lives of vulnerable people. Surely this could be championed by both Republicans and Democrats.
However, in office after office, we were told that these policy changes might be construed as support for the immigration policies of their political opposition and therefore could not be supported. Even when the offices agreed with what we were proposing, the risk of surrendering any ground in the political battle around immigration policy was too much to risk. Winning was more important than caring for the immigrants in our midst.
When we view politics as a territory to be won, a grand battle in which our fellow citizens are our enemies, this is what happens. This shift is not merely about a rhetorical difference, but affects actual policy. The common good, the protection of the vulnerable, a concern for justice, all take a back seat to political battles that reinforce fractures rather than mending them. If the guiding vision of politics is such that it manages to create division where there is common ground, how will it serve us in cases of actual disagreement?
That’s painful to read. “I could help these people, and I think it’s a good idea, but it might hurt my political career, so I’m not going to help.” Over and over. From both main parties. Putting their interests above American interests. Putting winning and personal gain ahead of tending the garden. Gardening is hard work, though:
It requires patience, care, perseverance, and flexibility. The cultivation of a healthy and fruitful political community is no different. It is easier to fight an ideological war than it is to cultivate a flesh-and-blood community. But if we care about the long-term health of our political community, we have no other option. [emphasis added]
If we focus on cultivating a community (i.e., tending the garden), we start to move in the direction that Jesus wanted us to go:
Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also. – Matthew 6:19-21
In other words, earthly treasures don’t count for much. They are the corruptible crowns that Aquinas described. Fighting to win a contest yields a temporary reward. Working to tend the garden helps our fellow man and can yield eternal rewards.
In this election cycle, I fear that too many of my fellow Christians went down the same path I started down – chasing the temporary reward of a victory for their preferred candidate. Russell Moore is a prominent Southern Baptist who spent election season swimming against that tide, as chronicled in this New Yorker piece. The final passage sums up Moore’s thinking:
[Moore] told the congregation about all the ways that Jesus calls us away from the life we think we want. … ‘The way of the Kingdom is not a way of strength and power,’ he said.
Putting too much faith in an elected leader – in their “strength and power” – leads us astray. It leads us to chasing crowns, victories, and earthly treasure, and we trample the garden in the process.
Like I said before, gardening is hard work, especially when the other gardeners may not be very nice to us. Again, we have to take the high road.
But I tell you, do not resist an evil person. If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other cheek also. – Matthew 5:39
The inability to turn the other cheek has been something that has really surprised me in recent months, and it was capped off by reactions to the presidential election results. (And it reminded me of my earlier blog post on the problem of factions.) The bitterness and vitriol I saw on social media from people on both sides was discouraging, especially when it came from people from whom I expected better. On the plus side, I did see plenty of the “better” as well, with many people (again, on both sides) thoughtfully touching on some of the points I’ve tried to make here.
To go back to No. 4 on my list above, we can all try to be nice, respectful, and considerate with people of all stripes. We can teach our children to do the same. That’s a good start for our garden. Our government may have trouble helping people from the top down, but each of us can work from the bottom up. We can value the people we encounter every day and avoid the temptation to reduce them to a caricature of things we dislike; we can view them with the love that God has for them, even when they make it really hard for us to do so.
Above all, as a Christian, I always have to trust God and his plans for me, my country, and the world:
So do not worry, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ For the pagans run after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them. But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well. Therefore do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself. Each day has enough trouble of its own. – Matthew 6:31-34
And if trusting in God isn’t your thing, then maybe Mickey Rivers, the former N.Y. Yankee All-Star, can convince you:
Ain’t no sense worryin’ about the things you got control over, ’cause if you got control over ’em, ain’t no sense worryin’. And ain’t no sense worryin’ about the things you don’t got control over, ’cause if you don’t got control over ’em, ain’t no sense worryin’.
Amen.